RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03114 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Louisiana to Ohio. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she enlisted in the Air Force, she was married to a soldier stationed in Louisiana who was in the process of being discharged from the Army. Her husband left all their household goods (HHG) in a storage unit in Louisiana. Her HHG are currently being stored at her parent’s home in Ohio. She would like them shipped to Florida, where she is currently stationed. However, she cannot do so without her HOR being changed to Ohio. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 16 May 2009. Her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Louisiana as her HOR. Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume I, Appendix A, states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member's convenience. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states the applicant’s records reflect Louisiana as the state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force. Louisiana is listed as her HOR on her DD Form 4. In accordance with AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 19 Mar 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2012-03114: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jul 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 6 Aug 2012, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Aug 2012. Panel Chair